Review Process

We have a very knowledgeable team of editors and an expert peer-review panel. Peer reviews come after the editor receives the author's submitted article. The article's validity, quality, structure, and overall intellectual content are all guaranteed by the editors. The editor's job is to detect these options and decide whether to accept, reject, format, change, or send the file back to the author for revision before transferring it for peer review. By choosing papers that significantly advance the author's knowledge and provide fresh, original contributions, our editors respect the journal's objective and breadth. Both our editorial staff and peer reviewers are highly qualified. Peer reviews happen after the editor receives an article from the author. 

The editors guarantee the article's accuracy, superiority, clarity, and general intellectual depth. Before sending a document for peer review, the editor's responsibility is to recognize these possibilities and decide whether to accept, reject, format, change, or send the author the document back for correction. Our editors respect the objective and scope of the journal by selecting papers that substantially further the author's knowledge and offer new, original contributions. They are in charge of choosing papers that make fresh, original, and significant contributions to the author's knowledge while upholding the journal's mission and scope. 

They begin by supervising the editorial process and making every effort to create the journal's content. Together with the publisher, the editors determine the journal's scope and, if necessary, offer recommendations and suggestions to both the publisher and the author. It is difficult to publish a research article, and articles published in the top databases for research must and should go through the peer-review process.

Peer review is a crucial process carried out by a group of subject-matter experts since it determines the quality of an article's publication in a journal based on its content and the comments made by its peers. In order to receive feedback from the target journals, peers will evaluate and compare the author's original research article and the reference journal they chose. By checking for plagiarism and other crucial elements that will be decided by the peer review panel, peers who are knowledgeable about the content can suggest whether the given article by the author is legitimate or not. They will advise the target journal about the rankings after reading the papers.

In order to achieve High-quality standards and High Impact factor journals, peer reviewing is the fundamental building block for any research article published in a top-tier indexed database journal, such as Google Scholar. The journal publication agency appoints a panel of experts in that field of study for the sake of the originality of the incoming article and to check the discrepancy like plagiarism if any in order to clarify that it is not published elsewhere. Peer review is necessary for authors' submitted articles. To keep track of the submitted article before it is published in the target journal, we immediately provide them with the Digital Object Identification Number (DOI) and certify it with the Crossref identification. because it allows peers to evaluate the reliability of the author's research and makes it easier to track down the article using the crossref article identification codes. Our peer reviewers make sure that the article is maintained and developed in accordance with the standards of our journal, and they also check the article's content for originality and authenticity. They are in charge of providing recommendations and suggestions to the author regarding the article's substance, organization, and veracity.

Our general process can be enumerated as follows:

Our editors are responsible for-

1. Identify the article: The article's veracity will be examined by our distinguished peer-review panel, which will also uphold and enhance the reputation and profile standards of the Journal. They must guarantee the excellent caliber of the manuscripts received for the article assignment.
2. Cross-check the article pattern: After correcting any inaccurate information in the article, our editors should make sure that the editing is finished promptly and that the author receives helpful feedback on the submitted article papers. We make sure that the article content is on the right track and complies with the standards set by our journal.
3. EPH journal standards: We are liable for any little complexities or discrepancies that may come up throughout the article submission process and we provide the author with tactics, rules, and techniques for doing so.
4. Organize Virtual Meetings: We frequently plan video conferences and meetings that are both groups- and individually focused. We discuss the goal and significance of the journals and invite potential contributors to think about submitting papers to the publication agency. 
5. Protecting Confidentiality of the Article: We offer the author a detailed set of instructions for putting together and submitting his manuscripts. We check the submitted article to make sure it adheres to the standards and policies of our journal. Our expert panel makes sure that there are no authorship conflicts and that the author's work is kept confidential from other authors.
6. Article’s decision: The text is reviewed by our editorial staff, who fix any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical mistakes they find. For the research piece to be successful, they should help the author incorporate their thoughts. Editors will use their methodology to make a decision regarding whether or not to continue with the research article. 
7. Identifying the article: Since it is his responsibility to verify the veracity of the article content, the editor's primary duty is to uphold and enhance the journal's profile and reputation. They must make sure that the article job only receives top-notch manuscripts.
8. Check the article structure: The editor must make sure that the article is edited promptly after any potential errors have been fixed and that the author has received helpful feedback on the articles they have submitted. The editor also makes sure that the submitted article is complete and that its illustrations, formatting, and references comply with requirements for international databases-indexed journals. Any unethical behavior on the part of the authors and reviewers will be pointed out by the editor, looked into, and corrected. The author should be handled fairly, politely, objectively, and honestly, according to editors.
9. Target Journal rules and guidelines: The Editor is in charge of handling any small complexities and discrepancies that surface during the article submission process, and it is their responsibility to communicate these to the author. holds the right to format the article as they see fit, including editing, deleting, or even adding pertinent information. They may also provide any additional manuscripts or reference materials the author requests.
10. Hold conferences: In addition to the responsibilities listed above, the editor should speak at conferences to discuss the goals and importance of the journals and to encourage potential authors to think about submitting their work to the publication agency. The target journals' indexes that the article should be listed in will be determined by the editor.
11. Protect the Confidentiality: In accordance with the timeline established with the publisher, the editor timely submits the peer-reviewed article for each issue. The editor needs to make it very clear what the author should do to prepare and submit their work. The editor must ensure that the received article complies with the requirements of the target journal. The editor should make sure that there is no conflict of interest with the authorship while also protecting the authors’ confidentiality.
12. Correct the errors if any: If there are any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors, the editor should read the entire piece carefully and make the necessary corrections. They must assist the author in incorporating their ideas into the research piece for it to be successful. Editors have their own methods for deciding whether or not to proceed with a research article when it comes to making decisions.
13. Builds trust: Peer reviews increase the reliability of the research article. In order to assess the caliber of the journal and uphold scientific integrity in journal publication, it will make it easier to identify the characteristics of the article content. Peer review of an article guarantees quality control, longevity, and content that is only pertinent to the target journals. The authors strengthen their writing communication and provide fresh workshop concepts while receiving helpful criticism from others in their field of expertise.
14. Removal of fraudulent content: Since the first review is conducted by peers, an article without peer review cannot be processed into the journal. Peer review, therefore, aids in the elimination of any fraudulent works that are plagiarised from other journals. They are regarded as a crucial informational resource and a means of evaluating the quality of journal publications. Peers help authors by adding value to the contributions of the author's article material, as well as by helping them comprehend and interpret the author's experience and assisting them in putting a valid article into print.
15. Target Journal Oriented:The author is required to confirm that the article standards adhere to those set forth by the target periodicals. They encourage the authors to build the essay in a positive and productive way. Peer review's primary goal is to uphold the target journal's credibility, openness, objectivity, confidentiality, security, integrity, and effectiveness. It also offers a platform for comments and analysis to determine the article's quality and ranking in the target journals.

Conclusion:

The peer-reviewed article's editing is a crucial next step, and EPH ensures that the content is accurate, authentic, and up to par with the standards required by the target journal. The final content-checking method is entirely the responsibility of the editorial staff. EPH always makes sure that the content of the article is heading in the right direction and that it complies with the rules and requirements of the target journal in order to be finally indexed in the International Databases. Our publishing house, EPH publication services, is crucial in the peer review analysis process for determining the type of article and whether or not to have it published in the list of indexed journals. After assessment by our professionals on the peer review panel, we are successful in producing several publications that are published in top indexed journals throughout the world. EPH - Journals like the Journal of Business Management, Journal of Social Science and Humanity Research, Journal of Applied Sciences, etc. have made it onto the list of indexed journals. EPH is a very reputable journal publication agency that publishes a wide range of research articles. Peer review is one of the many sophisticated tools that they have available for any discrepancies in incoming research articles.